The European Commission’s top data protection cop has ratcheted up the EU’s attack on the online advertising ecosystem, insisting it is time to finally crack down on pervasive tracking techniques which exploit vulnerable consumers’ personal data.
European Data Protection Supervisor Wojciech Wiewiórowski, a long-term critic of intrusive adtech methods, made his latest call for change in a blog post on the official website of the European Union.
He writes: “I can still remember how the Internet was once presented to me. A space where everyone could express themselves freely, find and share information, a global force for democracy. But the dream of that great agora was never fully realised.
“What was once the promise of a free and open environment was gradually replaced by walled gardens. The place for human flourishing became a space of advertising-driven business models and continuous surveillance. Digital services designed to maximise engagement, to track, to target.”
Wiewiórowski goes on to say that targeted advertising has concerned data protection advocates for many years but that he only recently became painfully aware of how its business model leads to societal harms.
He continues: “If Cambridge Analytica was becoming a fading memory, the recent testimony by Frances Haugen brought back sobering clarity. Political and ideological polarisation, disinformation and manipulation seem to have become inherent byproducts of today’s so called ‘attention economy’.”
Citing the proposed EU Digital Services Act and the Regulation on the Transparency & Targeting of Political Advertising, he backs the additional rules designed to increase transparency and accountability.
However, he adds: “Let me be clear: transparency is essential, but it is not enough. If we are truly serious about tackling the risks that surround online targeted advertising, we will need more than increased transparency.
“In our Opinion on the proposal for a Digital Services Act, we advocated for a prohibition of targeted advertising on the basis of pervasive tracking. Alternative models exist, but we need regulatory incentives to favour less intrusive forms of advertising that do not require tracking of user interaction with content.
“How do we achieve this? At the very least, we should consider further restricting the categories of personal data that can be processed for targeted advertising purposes. Special categories of data or other data that can be used to exploit vulnerabilities should not be used to target ads. Processing of data from vulnerable groups, such as children, can have unexpected results for an entire generation.
“The current state of the Internet is not set in stone; it is instead the product of human and political choices. It is time to make change happen. It is time to set clear limits to online targeted advertising.”
Related stories
‘Dismay’ as EU chief calls for ban on targeted online ads
Adtech framework is sunk; now firms must delete data
New IAB adtech framework ‘as flawed as the last one’
Big issues still to tackle in 2022: Online or off limits?
CMA action forces Google to delay demise of cookies
Privacy groups claim victory over looming adtech ruling
DMA wades into ICO row over axed adtech investigation
