MPs slam ICO and call for far tougher charity action

MPs 2Charities may already be up in arms over the new marketing restrictions but they simply do not go far enough, according to an investigation by MPs, which also slams the Information Commissioner’s Office for letting them get away with bad practice for so long. 
The Public Administration & Constitutional Affairs Committee report, published today, and due to be debated by Parliament this week, backed the Government’s acceptance of the Etherington review but maintains its proposals “should be further enhanced”.
It insists the new Fundraising Regulator should be made accountable to the Charity Commission, to ensure the new self-regulatory system works – or else. It is not a big fan of the Fundraising Preference Service either, saying that it would duplicate the function of the existing Telephone Preference Service.
An amendment to the Charities Bill, tabled by the chair of the committee Bernard Jenkin, would force the Commission to report annually to the Government on the effectiveness of fundraising regulation.
If charities do not get their houses in order, self-regulation should be scrapped. “It would be a sad and inexcusable failure of charities to govern their own behaviour, should statutory regulation become necessary,” the report says.
The report also lays into the Information Commissioner’s Office, insisting the ICO failed the public by not being proactive enough at regulating charities’ misuse of data in the past. Although it recognises the ICO is being more proactive now, this has come too late for many, it insists.
Jenkin said in a statement that charities’ trustees were either incompetent or “wilfully blind” to what was going on at their own organisations.
“This sorry episode has damaged the reputation of charities across the board, including those who have behaved properly, and hindered their ability to raise essential funds.
“This is the last chance for the trustees of charities, who allowed this happen, to put their house in order. Ultimately, the responsibility rests with them.”

Related stories
Charity probe reveals blatant disregard of data laws
Charities escape legal threat in last chance saloon
Charities to lose £5bn a year, says REaD group study
Grade becomes charity enforcer but critics fume
Graham slams ‘confusing’ charity preference service
IoF data advice two years out of date
Charities face marketing activity ban
Charity chiefs lay blame on agencies
FRSB axed in charity marketing purge
Charities cleared over Olive’s suicide
Colin Lloyd: fundraising out of control
Minister demands charity action
Charities using illegal marketing data
Charities hit again as row escalates
Charities in dock over donor blitz

Print Friendly

To leave a comment please register – it takes less than a minute and is free of charge. You will also get our weekly email update The DM Report (to opt out contact subscriptions@decisionmarketing.co.uk). If you are an existing user, please log in. If you have forgotten your log-in details please email info@decisionmarketing.co.uk to get them reset!

Existing Users Log In
 Remember Me  
New User Registration
*Required field