Nearly two-thirds of brand owners are already using generative AI in their marketing strategies, but 80% have expressed serious concerns about how their agencies are using the tech on their behalf, with legal, ethical and reputation risks also cited as major roadblocks to more widespread adoption.
So says a new study from the World Federation of Advertisers, which also reveals more than half of all marketers admit they have a lack of capabilities in this area and a general lack of AI maturity.
Despite these concerns, however, the use of GenAI is rising, and is well ahead of the 45% recorded by WFA research last year. In 2024, only 9% of brands say they have no current plans to use GenAI for their marketing.
The research is being released to coincide with new WFA voluntary guidance, developed with marketing consultancy R3, on the steps brands could consider taking to mitigate the legal risks of GenAI in agency contracts. It is designed to help the 55% of companies who currently plan to review their media and creative agency contracts to cover the specific risks associated with AI usage as well as its potential benefits.
The guidance follows an earlier publication from the WFA on the most commonly adopted responsible AI principles, along with standardised definitions.
The research findings are based on 54 responses from 48 of the world’s biggest companies, with a cumulative annual marketing spend of $102bn.
Most brands are still at the early stages of their GenAI journey. Just over a quarter (26%) claim to be ‘aware’ (they use gen AI in sporadic, occasional way) and 58% claim to be at a ‘developing’ stage (they have a dedicated GenAI strategy but it does not apply across all business units/teams).
Some 12% consider their organisations’ use of GenAI as ‘mature’ (they have a unified strategy that applies across all business units/teams), and a further 2% as ‘leading’ (GenAI is embedded in how they drive innovation) and ‘transformational’ (GenAI is changing their business models).
WFA chief executive Stephan Loerke said: “To harness the undisputed potential of GenAI, brands must first up get a grip on the legal and compliance implications. WFA’s AI Community and the guidance it’s producing will supercharge companies’ abilities to navigate the challenges so that they can prioritise the opportunities.”
Currently, just 36% of companies have introduced terms prescribing how their partners can use GenAI on their behalf, and only 29% have reviewed their media and creative contracts with partners to introduce AI-related clauses.
Nevertheless, 48% are planning to introduce such terms and over half are planning to review contracts (55%). The primary motivation behind plans is to ensure compliance with data governance, introduce warranties and indemnities and ensure ownership of outputs.
Just 9% of brand owners are reviewing contracts with creative talent (such as actors and voiceover artists), to provide for GenAI use in relation to their voice or likeness, but almost half (46%) are planning to.
R3 co-founder and principal Greg Paull said: “Ensuring that agency contracts are updated to address GenAI is an action every brand should take. Not only is it effective risk management, it’s an opportunity for marketers and their agencies to initiate important conversations about the role of AI in their partnerships.”
When it comes to use cases, GenAI is most commonly being embraced in the areas of content creation (79%), content ideation (67%) and task automation (54%).
Some 70% are prioritising the use of the technology for efficiencies (time and cost savings) over marketing effectiveness (increase revenue and returns on investments). While a few claim that GenAI use is driving ‘better media ROI’, ’50-80% increased efficiency’ and ’40-50% time saving for low-added value tasks’, many claim that it is still too early to measure the true impact.
Brand owners remain cautious about using AI-generated content in marketing assets (e.g. for text, image or music generation). Only 40% of respondents are currently doing so, although 37% plan on doing so soon. Of the 40%, a majority are using GenAI to alter or enhance real places, images or products (68%), to generate product descriptions or marketing copy (68%) or to generate places, images and products (59%). Just over one in three are using gen AI to copy the image/likeness of existing places or products (32%).
Brands remain cautious, however, and less than one in three of the 40% who are using GenAI in marketing assets are doing so for chatbot purposes or customer support (27%), to alter or enhance the appearance of talent (23%), or to create synthetic sounds (18%), humans (14%) or voices (9%). And only 5% are using GenAI to copy the image, voice or likeness of real talent; only 8% are partnering with AI-generated influencers.
To govern the use of GenAI, 63% of brands have already adopted responsible AI principles, while 21% are still in the process of developing them. The most adopted principles are privacy (78%), transparency (76%), responsibility (70%) and respect for intellectual property rights (65%).
However, only 35% of respondents have taken efforts to translate principles into market practice, with 40% saying they plan to in the near future. And less than half (44%) have policies or guidelines on the use of generative AI for marketing.
For those who have developed guidelines and policies, these are focused on limiting the use of GenAI for certain purposes and use cases, providing do’s and don’ts to teams on how they should or should not use the technology, outline approved internal use cases and limiting the use of certain tool providers.
Over half of brands (54%) also have an AI governance board in place, and 68% of those who have one say it addresses specifically the use of GenAI in marketing.
Related stories
Rolling out AI pilot schemes proves a ‘criticial challenge’
Cavalier approach to data holding back adoption of AI
Get data shipshape for GenAI or risk sinking, firms told
Get to grips with data hygiene if you want to clean up
CMOs admit lack of expertise is thwarting AI adoption
